Fresh Insights on What Helps Patient Recovery in the ICU

By Deborah Borfitz 

July 30, 2026 | The findings of more than 150 randomized controlled trials provide ample evidence that early mobilization of patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is both safe and beneficial. Surprisingly, also giving them extra protein—a strategy used successfully with frail and elderly patients—doesn’t appear to have any additive benefit, according to Dale Needham, M.D., Ph.D., professor of pulmonary and critical care medicine and physical medicine and rehabilitation at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.    

Needham and Stephanie Hiser, Ph.D., a physical therapist at Johns Hopkins Hospital, were part of the nearly decade-long Nutrition and Exercise in Critical Illness (NEXIS) trial looking at whether added protein nutritional intake could improve physical recovery for critically ill ARF patients (American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, DOI: 10.1093/ajrccm/aamag287). 

Notably, the study was conducted across nine U.S. academic medical centers unlikely to be representative of hospitals throughout the U.S., says Needham. That meant the control group received usual care rehabilitation of greater frequency than typical ICUs in the U.S., helping to explain why even the exercise portion of the intervention—in this case, in-bed cycling—did not show improved patient outcomes.  

Early rehab needs to replace the traditional approach of over-sedating patients, which unfortunately is still the standard practice in many hospital ICUs, says Hiser. “I always think about exercise and rehab like a drug ... [with an] optimal therapeutic window” where the dose is neither too low to provide improvement nor too high and causes adverse side effects. 

Next steps for the research team, once funding is secured, are to determine the best doses to give patients, says Needham. When rehabilitation therapists are scarce resources in the ICU, as they typically are, more patients are helped by knowing the threshold where more therapy stops speeding up recovery.  

Various types of evidence-based rehabilitation interventions are provided in the ICU, often by physical therapists but also occupational therapists and speech-language pathologists as well as nurses and doctors, says Needham. There have been no large, well-designed randomized trials supporting a pharmaceutical approach to reducing muscle weakness in critically ill patients. 

ARF is one of the top and most common admitting diagnoses in the ICU, he notes. Among patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, a severe type of ARF, post-ICU muscle weakness was independently associated with worse five-year survival in a 2017 study (Critical Care Medicine, DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002208)  

This is one of numerous studies showing a strong link between physical function and mortality, says Hiser. “We know when patients leave the hospital and they’re not able to move around as easily, it’s putting them at risk for other sequelae such as continued infections, pneumonia, [and] bedsores ... that could unfortunately lead them back to the hospital.” 

In a financial analysis of early rehabilitation conducted by Needham and his colleagues back in 2013, the affiliated savings was pegged at close to one million in an example scenario at a hospital with 900 annual admissions (Critical Care Medicine, DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182711de2). The news made the front page of The New York Times and followed the launch of the annual Johns Hopkins Critical Care Rehabilitation Conference attracting people from around the world to learn about its multidisciplinary approach to care. 

Unique Patient Population 

Needham has been involved in shaping the international clinical practice guidelines in ICU rehabilitation being collaboratively developed by the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society, which are expected to be made publicly available in another few months, he says. The most current clinical practice guideline was issued by the Society of Critical Care Medicine last year, an update to its original 2018 advice that recommended enhanced mobilization over usual rehabilitation (Critical Care Medicine, DOI: OI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006574). Many countries, including Japan and Korea, also have their own guidelines. 

While a large body of evidence ties early mobilization to ICU recovery milestones, rehabilitation is a broad term that includes everything from in-bed rolling and range of motion exercises to treadmill training and hydrotherapy, including people on life support, says Needham. “Where the evidence is much more limited is the combination of protein and exercise while patients are in the ICU,” making it the number one research priority in the critical care field. The dual approach has been demonstrated to improve muscle strength among elderly and frail individuals. 

Many people in the ICU are older and, even if they come in younger and strong, often leave looking frail and unable to walk, Needham continues. “That muscle weakness can last for months or years after they’ve been critically ill,” and this includes former weightlifters who once bench-pressed hundreds of pounds but later struggle to lift half that amount. 

“But of course the people who are most vulnerable aren’t the weightlifters who are going to make it back to work,” he says. “It’s older people who become so weak that they can’t lift their feet to get up two steps into their house, and then they may not go home because that weakness is going to prevent them from resuming their regular activities.”

What makes the ICU patient population unique is that they routinely receive deep sedation, days of bedrest, and limited amounts of nutrition. “When they’re sick and on life support, there is an imbalance of increased protein breakdown and decreased protein synthesis, so patients are having ... a net loss of protein.” 

This helped stimulate the idea that giving them extra protein, combined with exercise, might make up the difference. After a series of protocol planning meetings organized by nutrition researcher Daren Heyland, M.D., professor of medicine at Queen's University (Canada), and securing grant funding from the National Institutes of Health, enrollment for the NEXIS study began in 2017. 

Until the COVID pandemic hit and the study was put on pause, patients were being enrolled faster than expected, says Needham. Then findings from three large, randomized trials of protein supplementation were published, indicating that the increased protein intake (without added exercise) was not helpful and might be harmful to ICU patients with acute kidney injury. Perhaps this is because critically ill patients have anabolic resistance, and their bodies can’t effectively use supplemental protein during the early stages of critical illness, he adds. 

After publication of these large protein-only trials, patients with acute kidney injury were excluded from the NEXIS trial, reducing the number of people eligible to enroll. By the time grant funding ran out in 2025, 115 participants had joined the study. “Even though our sample size is a little bit smaller than we had targeted, the findings are still quite strong,” Needham says, especially when combined with results of the large protein supplementation trials. “We need to focus our attention elsewhere.”  

Future Directions 

Future work for lab-based researchers includes better understanding if, and when, anabolic resistance in critically ill patients decreases enough later in their critical illness or during their recovery period for protein supplementation, on top of exercise, to enhance outcomes as it does for older and frail patients, says Needham. It may well be that the nutrition strategy needs to be implemented in a different timeframe to be of benefit. 

In terms of early mobilization, ICUs need the wherewithal to deliver the kind of helpful rehabilitation routinely done in academic medical centers like Johns Hopkins Hospital. Physical therapists are heavily utilized here, says Hiser, but that is not the case at other hospitals where patients are being overly sedated. “We unfortunately can’t do much in those scenarios ... we need patients awake and able to actively engage in the therapy sessions for them to really reap the benefits of what we’re able to offer in that setting.”  

Hospitals around the world still need to catch up, agrees Needham, although the usual care provided in ICUs participating in outcomes studies has been steadily improving. As the NEXIS trial suggested, the control group in future studies should probably be prescribed the dose of rehabilitation delivered by most ICUs in the country to enable researchers to make a better comparison with those in the intervention arm. 

In-bed cycling, which requires specialized equipment, isn’t being singled out as the sole beneficial exercise for ICU patients, points out Needham. It was chosen for the NEXIS trial because the dose could be precisely controlled, and delivery of the exercise was measurable in terms of the amount of time, days, and distance patients cycled. The cycling machine can be used on patients who are laying on their back in bed and has active, active-assisted, and passive modes and therefore can be used by individuals who are fully or partially awake as well as those who are sedated. 

Load more comments
comment-avatar